Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HOLMES v. BROODNO (09/15/72)

decided: September 15, 1972.

HOLMES
v.
BROODNO, APPELLANT



Appeal from order of Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, of Philadelphia, Jan. T., 1968, No. 1345, in case of Rufus Holmes v. Cyrus Broodno.

COUNSEL

Thomas Holmes Goldsmith, for appellant.

Arthur J. Seidner, and Jerome Taylor and Associates, for appellee.

Wright, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packel, JJ. Opinion by Packel, J. Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J. Watkins and Jacobs, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.

Author: PACKEL

[ 222 Pa. Super. Page 479]

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

Disposition

Order reversed.

Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

19720915

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.