Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HOLMES v. BROODNO (09/15/72)

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: September 15, 1972.

HOLMES
v.
BROODNO, APPELLANT

Appeal from order of Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, of Philadelphia, Jan. T., 1968, No. 1345, in case of Rufus Holmes v. Cyrus Broodno.

COUNSEL

Thomas Holmes Goldsmith, for appellant.

Arthur J. Seidner, and Jerome Taylor and Associates, for appellee.

Wright, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packel, JJ. Opinion by Packel, J. Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J. Watkins and Jacobs, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.

Author: PACKEL

[ 222 Pa. Super. Page 479]

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

Disposition

Order reversed.

Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

19720915

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.