Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

BALLARIEL v. HOAGERHYDE (03/24/72)

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: March 24, 1972.

BALLARIEL
v.
HOAGERHYDE, APPELLANT

Appeals from order of Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, of Allegheny County, Jan. T., 1970, Nos. 1521 and 1522, in case of Mary Ballariel and Reginald Ballariel v. Donna J. Hoagerhyde; Laura Language and Ernest Language v. Donna J. Hoagerhyde and Mary Ballariel.

COUNSEL

Cosmos J. Reale, for appellant.

Jon L. Friedman, with him Friedman, Friedman and Weisman, for appellee.

Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Cercone, JJ. (Spaulding, J., absent). Opinion by Hoffman, J.

Author: Hoffman

[ 220 Pa. Super. Page 415]

This appeal presents the same question which was decided by our Court in Szarmack v. Welch, 220 Pa. Superior Ct. 407, 289 A.2d 149 (1972). For the reasons given in Szarmack, we hold that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4007(a) requires the disclosure of the existence and policy limits of liability insurance coverage.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Disposition

Order affirmed.

19720324

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.