UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
decided: February 29, 1972.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ANTONIO MONACO, APPELLANT
Maris and Rosenn, Circuit Judges, and VanArtsdalen, District Judge.
Author: Per Curiam
Opinion OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for making a false statement as to a material fact in a proceeding relating to naturalization in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1015. Appellant, Monaco, originally entered a plea of not guilty to the charge, but on June 21, 1971, he retracted this plea and entered a plea of guilty.
The only issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court, in accepting appellant's plea of guilty, complied with Rule 11,*fn1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, as interpreted in McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S. Ct. 1166, 22 L. Ed. 2d 418 (1969), and Woodward v. United States, 426 F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1970).
We have examined the record pertaining to the colloquy between appellant and the court and reviewed all of the circumstances brought to our attention by appellant. There is nothing to indicate that appellant's plea was other than factually supported. The trial court extensively examined the appellant personally. The facts surrounding the crime were developed clearly and it was readily apparent that there was substantial evidence which showed that appellant had in fact committed the crime as charged. We find no error committed by the district court. The plea of guilty was entered and made by the appellant voluntarily and intelligently with an understanding of the nature of the charge, and the consequences of the plea.
The judgment will be affirmed.