Appeal from decree of Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County, Jan. T., 1969, No. 73, in case of Elmer Eifert v. Geraldine E. Eifert.
Hervey B. Smith, with him Smith, Eves and Keller, for appellant.
Franklin E. Kepner, for appellee.
Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ. Opinion by Spaulding, J. Watkins and Jacobs, JJ., dissent.
[ 219 Pa. Super. Page 374]
Appellant Geraldine Eifert appeals from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County overruling the findings of a Master and awarding appellee Elmer Eifert a final decree in divorce a.v.m.
Appellee instituted this action pursuant to Section 10 of The Divorce Law of 1929.*fn1 Appellee contends that he is entitled to a divorce because of indignities suffered
[ 219 Pa. Super. Page 375]
when appellant became intoxicated. From the record, it appears that the couple's sole source of entertainment was weekend visits to local taprooms. These visits occurred practically every Friday and Saturday night for some eight years and on many of these occasions appellant would become inebriated and subject appellee to verbal abuse.
Appellant concedes that she is a heavy drinker, but nevertheless contends that appellee is not an "innocent and injured spouse" as he was in part responsible for her condition in that he continually took her to places where the only thing one could do was drink.
The Master found against appellee, stating that he was not an "innocent and injured spouse" as required under the statute. The lower court, however, found that the parties "were not equally at fault" and granted appellee the divorce.*fn2
It is our duty to make an independent study of the case. DeMedio v. DeMedio, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 255, 260, 257 A.2d 290, 294 (1969), aff'd per curiam, 437 Pa. 579, 260 A.2d 738 (1970). After a careful review of the record and an examination of the relevant ...