Appeal from order of Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, No. 478 of 1968, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Charles Michael Breon.
Edward L. Willard, Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles C. Brown, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding and Cercone, JJ. Opinion by Hoffman, J. Wright, P. J., dissents.
[ 220 Pa. Super. Page 391]
This case involves an appeal from the denial of appellant's first Post Conviction Hearing Act petition. The court below summarized the facts as follows:
"The defendant filed a PCHA petition on October 24, 1969. The petition was summarily dismissed by this court because of the extensive record which refuted the allegations of the petitioner. On an appeal to the Superior Court the matter was remanded to this court for an evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to this order, the court held two evidentiary hearings: one on September 15, 1970, and an adjourned hearing on December 10, 1970. The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was unlawfully induced because promises were made to him by a trooper of the state police and that he was unaware of the consequences of the entry of a guilty plea."
Appellant's court-appointed counsel has submitted the following "brief" and, by separate petition, has asked for leave to withdraw. The "brief" reads as follows:
"Brief on Behalf of Defendant
"This case was initiated by the Defendant himself and the undersigned appears as Public Defender at the request of the Court at a hearing on December 10, 1970.
"It appeared that there had been a plea of guilty but it also appeared that there was nothing on the record to show that he had been informed of his right to appeal as required by law. The record was examined in Chambers of the Court in great detail and it appears to the undersigned that the Defendant was at all times represented by competent counsel and had a previous Post Conviction Hearing Appeal in which an Evidentuary [sic] Hearing was held and that his allegations were totally without merit.
[ 220 Pa. Super. Page 392]
"Before the Public Defender could reach the papers thereafter they had been forwarded to the Superior Court and were unavailable so that specific reference cannot be made. The Public Defender had no connection with this case prior to December 10, 1970, hence has no copies of the record or even of the Post Conviction Hearing Appeal but is personally satisfied ...