Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. SILVERMAN (06/29/71)

decided: June 29, 1971.

COMMONWEALTH
v.
SILVERMAN



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, of Allegheny County at No. SA-801 of 1970 in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kenneth M. Silverman.

COUNSEL

Anthony J. Maiorana, Assistant Attorney General, with him Robert W. Cunliffe, Deputy Attorney General, and J. Shane Creamer, Attorney General, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer and Mencer, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Mencer.

Author: Mencer

[ 2 Pa. Commw. Page 539]

This is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, dated October 20, 1970, which sustained the appeal of Kenneth M. Silverman from a suspension of three months imposed by the Secretary of Revenue (now the Secretary of Transportation).

By a host of authorities, the Courts of Common Pleas, in appeals arising from the suspension of operator's licenses, are directed to hear such cases de novo. See The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, as amended, 75 P.S. ยง 620, and Annot., 97 A.L.R. 2d 1367, 1371-1372 (1964).

The Common Pleas judge has the duty to make findings of fact both (1) where there is disputed or credible conflicting testimony, and (2) where there is undisputed testimony but extenuating facts and circumstances are submitted. Commonwealth v. Emerick, 373 Pa. 388,

[ 2 Pa. Commw. Page 54096]

A.2d 370 (1953); Commonwealth v. Strobel, 375 Pa. 292, 100 A.2d 43 (1953), same case, 378 Pa. 84, 105 A.2d 152 (1954).

In the instant case the Judge failed to make specific findings of fact, nor did he specifically state conclusions of law. How, then, is this Court to fulfill its duty "to determine whether the findings of the court below are supported by competent evidence and to correct any erroneous conclusions of law"? See Commonwealth v. James F. McCartney, 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 540, 279 A.2d 77 (1971), and cases cited therein. We are particularly interested in receiving specific findings of the facts surrounding appellee's request for a continuance, if any, and why it was not granted.

Therefore, in keeping with this opinion, we issue ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.