Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

GREENSPUN v. AMERICAN ADHESIVES

December 18, 1970

Leonard GREENSPUN, t/a Lee Table Pad Manufacturing Company
v.
AMERICAN ADHESIVES, INC.


John W. Lord, Jr., Chief Judge.


The opinion of the court was delivered by: LORD, JR.

JOHN W. LORD, Jr., Chief Judge.

 Presently before the Court is defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

 From about January of 1966, and continuing for a period of two years, plaintiff purchased from defendant a glue used to put together table pads which it manufactured. These adhesives were shipped in drums with two gummed labels affixed, one on the side and one on the end. Imprinted on each label was the following language:

 
"Important -- Read Carefully Before Opening: We exclude all warranties, express or implied, with respect to these goods including warranties of fitness for a particular purpose and merchantability. This provision is the final agreement of the parties and can be modified only by one of our officers in writing. In any event, purchaser's damages shall not exceed the price of the goods. If purchaser does not want the goods subject to these terms, they should be returned unopened."

 Following each delivery, defendant forwarded by first class mail to plaintiff an invoice, which served as a bill for the purchase price of the contract. Imprinted on each was the following statement:

 
"WARRANTIES: Since we have no control over the conditions under which these goods are transported or under which the purchaser stores, handles, or uses these goods, we make no warranty, either express or implied, with respect to these goods or their fitness for any purpose or the results to be obtained from their use. No representative of ours has authority to waive or change this provision, which applies to all sales. IF THE PURCHASER DOES NOT ACCEPT THE GOODS ON THESE TERMS, THEY ARE TO BE RETURNED AT ONCE, UNOPENED."

 It is undisputed that the Uniform Commercial Code governs, *fn1" and that warranties may be disclaimed under the Code. UCC ┬ž 2-316 states:

 
"(2) Subject to subsection (3), to exclude or modify the implied warranty of merchantability or any part of it the language must mention merchantability and in case of a writing must be conspicuous, and to exclude or modify any implied warranty of fitness the exclusion must be by a writing and conspicuous." (Emphasis added).

 The primary objective of this section of the Code is to avoid the fine print waiver of rights by the buyer. 1 Anderson Uniform Commercial Code, 2d Ed. 677 (1970).

 In its memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment, defendant cites the above quoted section of the Code and states, "Each of the two labels attached to each drum of adhesive clearly and effectively disclaimed all warranties. Merchantability and fitness for purpose were specifically mentioned, and the disclaimer was obviously conspicuous." (Emphasis added). We disagree.

 Section 1-201(10) of the Code defines conspicuous as "A printed heading in capitals. * * * Language in the body of the form is 'conspicuous' if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color."

 Defendant's shipping label does not contain a conspicuous heading. Only the first letter of each word in ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.