Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PETRISKO v. VEREB

December 19, 1969

George J. PETRISKO, Plaintiff,
v.
Andrew VEREB, Defendant



The opinion of the court was delivered by: MARSH

 MARSH, Chief Judge.

 The plaintiff presented a civil action, in forma pauperis, under the Civil Rights Act, Sec. 1983, Title 42 U.S.C., and Sec. 1343, Title 28 U.S.C., against Andrew Vereb, seeking damages in the amount of $20,000 for causing the conviction of plaintiff for murder by giving false and perjurious testimony against the plaintiff at his trial.

 It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff is a prisoner confined in the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; that he was convicted of a capital crime on November 26, 1968, but has not been sentenced.

 It appears from Exhibit "A" attached to the complaint that the defendant Vereb was formerly a carpenter; that when he was called as a witness by the Commonwealth, Vereb identified a club found at the scene of the crime which, he testified, had been cut down and beveled by him at the request of the defendant, and that he gave the club to the defendant.

 It is not alleged in the complaint that Mr. Vereb, when he testified, was an official of the Commonwealth or was acting under color of state law. Absent facts warranting such a conclusion a district court does not have jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act § 1983. *fn1" A plaintiff seeking damages under the civil rights statutes must allege highly specific facts. United States ex rel. Hoge v. Bolsinger, 211 F. Supp. 199 (W.D.Pa.1962), aff'd 311 F.2d 215 (3d Cir. 1962); Pugliano v. Staziak, 231 F. Supp. 347, 349 (W.D.Pa.1964), aff'd 345 F.2d 797 (3d Cir. 1965); Weyandt v. Mason's Stores, Inc., 279 F. Supp. 283 (W.D.Pa.1968).

 In my opinion the complaint shows on its face that the court lacks jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act or under any other federal law and, accordingly, should be dismissed.

 An appropriate order will be ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.