Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. BUTLER (06/12/69)

decided: June 12, 1969.

COMMONWEALTH
v.
BUTLER, APPELLANT



Appeal from order of Criminal Courts of Centre County, June T., 1966, Nos. 176 and 181, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Thomas A. Butler.

COUNSEL

Charles J. Weyandt, for appellant.

Charles C. Brown, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ. Concurring Opinion by Hoffman, J.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 214 Pa. Super. Page 458]

Order affirmed.

Disposition

Order affirmed.

Concurring Opinion by Hoffman, J.:

Appellant maintains that he was improperly represented at his guilty plea hearing because his attorney also represented his co-defendant who likewise pleaded guilty.

Appellant fails, however, to maintain that a defense was available to him which was inconsistent with the position taken by his co-defendant.

The principles governing this case are supplied by Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v. Russell, 406 Pa. 45, 176 A.2d 641 (1962) and Commonwealth v. Resinger, 432 Pa. 398, 248 A.2d 55 (1968).

In Whitling, the Court stated that "If, in the representation of more than one defendant, a conflict of interest arises, the mere existence of such a conflict vitiates the proceedings, even though no actual harm results." Throughout the cases following Whitling, and most recently in Resinger, this has been interpreted to mean that a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.