June 5, 1969
Petition for post-conviction relief. Appeals, Nos. 94 and 95, April T., 1969, from order of Court of Oyer and Terminer of Allegheny County, June T., 1966, Nos. 36 and 109, opinion by MCCORMICK, J., specially presiding.
Fred E. Baxter, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, and George H. Ross, Rublic Defender,
Page 715for appellant; Charles B. Watkins, Carol Mary Los, and Robert L. Campbell, Assistant District Attorneys, and Robert W. Duggan, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Opinion PER CURIAM: The court below dismissed appellant's post-conviction petition which alleged only denial of the right to appeal from guilty pleas. It did not independently determine the legality of the sentence and voluntariness of the pleas as required by Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74, note 1 at page 76, 244 A.2d 757 (1968). Appellant shall be allowed to amend his petition, if possible, to allege specific, non-frivolous facts not controverted by the record and pertaining to the sentence or plea which, if true, entitle him to relief. If such amendment is made, the necessary determination shall be made only after a full and fair evidentiary hearing on the facts alleged.
Accordingly, the order of the court is vacated and the record remanded for this determination.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.