decided: April 23, 1969.
Appeal from order of Court of Oyer and Terminer of Lancaster County, Dec. T., 1959, No. 216, Indictment June T., 1963, No. 83, in case of Commonwealth v. Harry B. White.
Miles Warner, for appellant.
Henry J. Rutherford, Assistant District Attorney, and Clarence C. Newcomer, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Theodore Voorhees, and Dechert, Price & Rhoads, for amicus curiae.
Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.
Author: Per Curiam
[ 434 Pa. Page 70]
On June 14, 1960, Harry B. White was convicted by a jury in Lancaster County of murder in the first degree and punishment was fixed at life imprisonment. No post-trial motions were filed, and judgment of sentence was imposed in accordance with the jury's verdict. Throughout these proceedings, White was represented by self-retained counsel. No appeal was entered from the judgment.
In October 1964, White instituted an action in habeas corpus which was dismissed by the trial court. In these proceedings, White was represented by court-appointed counsel. On appeal we affirmed, 419 Pa. 244, 213 A.2d 662 (1965).
In September 1966, White instituted proceedings seeking post-conviction relief. The court below dismissed these proceedings without hearing, and an appeal from that order is now before us.
[ 434 Pa. Page 71]
The only contention requiring discussion in the present proceedings is that White was unconstitutionally denied his right to appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed in 1960 in violation of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963). This contention was raised for the first time in the present action and was not asserted in the 1964 habeas corpus proceedings in which White was represented by counsel. Under such circumstances, this claim has been waived. See Commonwealth v. Mumford, 430 Pa. 451, 243 A.2d 440 (1968), and § 4, Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, 19 P.S. § 1180-4.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.