Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ANTANITIS v. HECHT (11/12/68)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: November 12, 1968.

ANTANITIS
v.
HECHT, APPELLANT

Appeal from judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, May T., 1964, No. 787, in case of Joseph Antanitis, administrator of estate of Fred Antanitis, deceased, et al. v. Dr. Arthur L. Hecht.

COUNSEL

Francis H. Patrono, with him Robert D. Beck, and Patrono, Ceisler and Edwards, for appellant.

Stephen I. Richman, with him Greenlee, Richman, Derrico & Posa, for appellee.

Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien and Roberts, JJ. Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 432 Pa. Page 621]

This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court's refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.

Judgment affirmed.

Disposition

Judgment affirmed.

19681112

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.