Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER (06/30/67)

decided: June 30, 1967.

COMMONWEALTH
v.
ALEXANDER, APPELLANT



Appeal from order of Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County, July T., 1953, Nos. 413 to 418, inclusive, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James B. Alexander.

COUNSEL

James B. Alexander, appellant, in propria persona.

Burton D. Fretz and Alan J. Davis, Assistant District Attorneys, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien and Roberts, JJ. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Bell. Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Author: Bell

[ 426 Pa. Page 361]

This is an appeal from the Order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County dismissing Alexander's petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act.*fn*

Alexander was tried for murder and related charges on June 28, 1954. He pleaded guilty to and the Court found him guilty of all charges, on which he received a prison sentence of 20 1/2 to 41 years.*fn** Eleven years later he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. That petition was dismissed and Alexander then filed this petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. This petition was also dismissed and from the Order dismissing this petition Alexander has appealed to this Court.

Alexander contends that his convictions were invalid because he was proceeded against, prosecuted and sentenced by a "religious establishment" in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. He further contends that his convictions should be invalidated because the Judge and the prosecuting attorney took an oath of office.

Alexander's contentions are not only devoid of any legal merit, they are absolutely ridiculous. If his theory of the law and his interpretation of the Federal and the State Constitution were accepted and his conviction invalidated, it would (as he admits) nullify every criminal conviction ever obtained in the Commonwealth

[ 426 Pa. Page 362]

    of Pennsylvania, and would make a mockery of every oath taken by every Judge and every public official from the President of the United States to a magistrate.

It is a matter of common knowledge that all Governors, Senators, Representatives, and the President of the United States and all State and County officers, as well as all members of the Judiciary -- from the highest to the lowest in the Land -- take an oath of office (or affirm), in which, in slightly different language, they solemnly swear to support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and, if a State or County official also the Constitution of Pennsylvania.

Com. ex rel. Brown v. Rundle, 424 Pa. 505, 227 A.2d 895, is almost identical with the instant case and, if authority were needed, which it isn't, is controlling. In that case, the Court said (pp. 506-7, 508): "Brown contends that his conviction and sentence for second degree murder is void because he was '. . . proceeded against, prosecuted and sentenced by a religious establishment. . . .' He apparently argues that his conviction violates the Federal Constitution [and also the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.