Appeal from order of Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County, April T., 1965, No. 1464, in the matter of revocation of club liquor license No. C-2460 issued to Veterans of Foreign Wars, Slook Montague Post 354.
James Iannucci, Special Assistant Attorney General, with him I. Harry Checchio, Special Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Shannon, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General, for Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, appellant.
Colbert C. McClain, for appellee.
Ervin, P. J., Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ. Opinion by Spaulding, J.
[ 208 Pa. Super. Page 79]
This is an appeal by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board from an order of the Quarter Sessions Court of Philadelphia County reversing the Board's suspension of appellee's liquor license.
The Board based its suspension on the following findings:
"1. The licensed organization, by its servants, agents or employes sold alcoholic beverages on the licensed premises to non-members, on December 22, 1963.
2. Persons are admitted to membership in the licensed organization without written application, investigation or ballot."
The principal witness at the Board hearing and at the trial was police officer Joseph Liciardello. He testified that he was admitted to the club and purchased drinks there merely by paying a dollar and filling out an application form. The court's opinion states that this testimony "was given in a belligerent and defiant manner to such an extent that the court is loath to base a finding on his uncorroborated testimony." The
[ 208 Pa. Super. Page 80]
court then concluded that the officer's testimony was "too inconsistent and improbable upon which to base a finding."
We do not agree with this conclusion. We readily concede that the written record to which we are limited cannot present a totally accurate picture of the demeanor and credibility of a witness at trial. However, there is nothing in this record which disqualifies the testimony of the officer. His statements were not contradicted. They clearly establish a violation of the regulations which stipulate that no liquor may be sold by club licensees to nonmembers and that admission to membership shall be by ...