Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

DIRECTORY PUBLISHING COMPANY v. PITTSBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (06/17/65)

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: June 17, 1965.

DIRECTORY PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
PITTSBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Appeal from judgment of County Court of Allegheny County, No. A2164 of 1963, in case of Directory Publishing Co., Inc. v. School District of City of Pittsburgh et al.

COUNSEL

John G. Kish, with him Brennan & Brennan, for appellant.

Justin M. Johnson, Assistant School Solicitor, with him Niles Anderson, School Solicitor, Regis C. Nairn, Assistant City Solicitor, and David W. Craig, City Solicitor, for appellee.

Ervin, P. J., Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, and Hoffman, JJ. (Flood, J., absent). Opinion by Wright, J.

Author: Wright

[ 205 Pa. Super. Page 431]

This appeal is a companion to that in Directory Publishing Company v. City of Pittsburgh, 205 Pa. Superior Ct. 423, 211 A.2d 509. The taxes in question were assessed by the School District of the City of Pittsburgh under authority of the Act of June 20, 1947, P. L. 745, 24 P.S. 582.1 et seq., which requires wholesale or retail vendors of, or dealers in, goods, wares and merchandise to procure a mercantile license and to pay an annual mercantile license tax. The definition section of the statute provides in pertinent part as follows: "(4) 'Dealer in, or vendor of, goods, wares and merchandise' shall not include any mechanic who keeps a store or warehouse at his place of manufactory or workshop in which he sells only his own manufactures,

[ 205 Pa. Super. Page 432]

    any person vending or disposing of articles of his own growth, produce or manufacture, or any hawker or peddler licensed under any law of this Commonwealth".

The instant appeal is controlled by our opinion filed this day in the companion case. Although the language in the tax anything act differs somewhat from that in the statute here under consideration, the same question is involved. Cf. Koolvent Aluminum Awning Co. v. Pittsburgh, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 233, 142 A.2d 428.

Judgment affirmed.

Disposition

Judgment affirmed.

19650617

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.