Appeal (petition for allocatur), No. 103, Jan. T., 1965, from order of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1964, No. 296, affirming order of Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, Sept. T., 1963, No. 2046, in case of Commonwealth ex rel. Ronald Remeriez v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent. Petition for allocatur granted, orders reversed with directions to issue writ of habeas corpus.
Ronald Remeriez, petitioner, in propria persona.
John F. Hassett, Assistant District Attorney, Thomas M. Reed, Chief Assistant District Attorney, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, District Attorney, for respondent.
Before Bell, C.j., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'brien and Roberts, JJ.
OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS
Petitioner seeks allowance of appeal to this Court after dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, affirmed by the Superior Court. The petitioner was sentenced to imprisonment after revocation of a prior suspended sentence and probation. Petitioner was without counsel at this hearing. The record clearly indicates that the court made no inquiry concerning counsel and that there was no waiver of counsel by petitioner.
Petitioner urges that lack of counsel during the hearing which resulted in the revocation of his probation
and the imposition of a prison sentence violated due process.*fn1
It is evident from the record that for this petitioner the hearing at which sentence was imposed was, in reality, the final opportunity for presenting and urging matters and circumstances which, in the discretion of the trial court, may have determined the freedom or imprisonment of the accused.
Such a sentencing is a critical stage in the proceeding against the accused. For the sentencing to be constitutionally acceptable the accused is entitled to be represented by counsel.*fn2 See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792 (1963); White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59, 83 S.Ct. 1050 (1963); cf. United States v. Tribote, 297 F.2d 598, 601 (2d Cir. 1961). See also Commonwealth ex rel. O'Lock v. Rundle, 415 Pa. 515, 204 A.2d 439 (1964).
On this record there is but one proper disposition of this case on its merits. No need appears for remanding this habeas corpus petition for a hearing in the court below.*fn3 Likewise, ...