Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

RIMPA v. BELL (01/21/64)

January 21, 1964

RIMPA
v.
BELL, APPELLANT.



Appeal, No. 215, March T., 1963, from judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County, May T., 1962, No. 1, in case of Carl Rimpa v. Helen Bell, formerly Helen Motter, administratrix of estate of Lawrence R. Motter, deceased, William Hull and Emery Transportation Company. Judgment affirmed.

COUNSEL

Paul E. Allen, with him Stuart A. Culbertson, and Culbertson and Allen, for appellant.

John M. McLaughlin, with him George Barco, and Knox, Weber, Pearson & McLaughlin, and Barco and Barco, for appellees.

Before Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'brien and Roberts, JJ.

Author: O'brien

[ 413 Pa. Page 275]

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE O'BRIEN

The instant appeal is from a judgment on the pleadings, entered for the additional defendants and against the original defendant. The facts are well summarized in the opinion of the court below as follows: "On February 13, 1962, an action in trespass was instituted by the filing of a complaint by Carl Rimpa against Helen Bell, formerly Helen Motter, Administratrix of the Estate

[ 413 Pa. Page 276]

    of Lawrence R. Motter, Deceased. The action was brought for the recovery of damages to a truck tractor owned by the Plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of the decedent, Lawrence R. Motter, at the time when the truck tractor was being operated by one William Hull, who was in the employ of Emery Transportation Company, which leased the truck tractor from the Plaintiff.

" On March 7, 1962, a writ was issued by the Original Defendant joining as Additional Defendants in the action, William Hull and Emery Transportation Company. On praecipe of the Additional Defendants, a Rule To File Complaint was issued on the Original Defendant on June 16, 1962, and thereafter, on July 17, 1962, the Original Defendant filed a complaint in which it is claimed that if she is liable, the Additional Defendants are jointly liable with her and are liable over to her on the Plaintiff's cause of action. Incorporated in the Original Defendants complaint was a counterclaim of the Original Defendant against the Additional Defendant for damages to the automobile of the decedent as a result of the accident.

"On August 30, 1962, the Additional Defendants filed an Answer to the Original Defendant's complaint and under New Matter pleaded that on or about July 25, 1960, the Original Defendant, Helen Motter, Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence R. Motter, Deceased, executed a general release in favor of Emery Transportation Company, Mid-West Transfer Company (the successor to Emery Transportation Company), and William Hull, a copy of which was attached as part of the Answer, it being alleged that the terms of the release extended to the liability set forth in the Original Defendant's complaint and counterclaim.

"The original defendant filed a reply to the additional defendants' New Matter on November 19, 1962, wherein she admitted that ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.