Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MID-CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION PHILADELPHIA v. ALLEN (01/07/64)

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 7, 1964

MID-CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA
v.
ALLEN, APPELLANT.

Appeal, No. 265, Jan. T., 1963, from order of Court of Common Pleas No. 3 of Philadelphia County, Dec. T., 1962, No. 626, in case of Mid-City Federal Savings and Loan Association of Philadelphia v. G. Wesley Allen and Helen McGerald, guardians of estate of Isaac N. Patterson, incompetent. Order affirmed.

COUNSEL

Jacob J. Kilimnik, for appellants.

Edwin S. Malmed, for appellee.

Before Bell, C.j., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'brien and Roberts, JJ.

Author: Eagen

[ 413 Pa. Page 174]

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE EAGEN

This is an appeal from an order in the court below refusing to strike off a judgment, entered by virtue of a warrant of attorney included in a bond, which accompanied the execution and delivery of a mortgage.

At the time of the execution of the instruments involved, the debtor was sane, however, before judgment was confessed on the bond, he had been judicially declared

[ 413 Pa. Page 175]

    incompetent, under the Act of February 28, 1956, P.L. (1955) 1154, as amended, 50 P.S. § 3511. The validity of the mortgage and bond is not now questioned, but it is urged that the declaration of incompetency terminated the right to subsequently enter the confession of judgment, and that therefore, the judgment is void. With this position, we do not agree.

A power of attorney to confess judgment for a proper consideration is security to the creditor, is coupled with an interest and is irrevocable. The entry of the judgment is not a new act of the debtor, but is a legal result beyond his control. Lunacy will not revoke a power of attorney to confess judgment, which was valid when executed: Spencer v. Reynolds, 9 C.C. 249 (1890); Homer City National Bank v. Mahan, 3 Pa. D. & C. 35 (1922); Johnson v. National Bank of Mattoon, 320 Ill. 389, 151 N.E. 231 (1926); Davis v. Lane, 10 N.H. 156 (1839); McCaul v. Thayer, 70 Wis. 138, 35 N.W. 353 (1887); Matthiessen & Weichers Refining Co. v. McMahon's Adm'r., 38 N.J.L. 536 (1876); Hill v. Day, 34 N.J.Eq. 150 (1881); 44 A.L.R. 1306 (1926); Annot., 44 A.L.R. 1310 (1926); Klein, Judgment by Confession in Pennsylvania, § 13 at 52 and 53 (1929); 1 Mechem on Agency, § 679 (2d ed. 1914); Elliot on Contracts, § 461 at 689 (1913); and, Shuchman, Penna. Judgment Notes, § 24.1 at 87 (1961).

Disposition

Order affirmed.

19640107

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.