Appeal, No. 383, Oct. T., 1962, from order of Court of Quarter Sessions of the Peace of Montgomery County, Sept. T., 1957, No. 177, in case of Jean Hecht v. Richard E. Hecht. Order reduced.
Kiefer N. Gerstley, with him Raymond Pearlstine, and Wisler, Pearlstine, Talone & Gerber, for appellant.
Michael A. Foley, with him William C. Cahall, III, for appellee.
Before Rhodes, P.j., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.
[ 200 Pa. Super. Page 239]
This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to reduce an order for the support of two minor
[ 200 Pa. Super. Page 240]
children. In 1958, the court below entered an order of $400 a month, and we raised it to $550 a month. Hecht v. Hecht, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 276, 150 A.id 139 (1959).
The evidence of the petitioner indicates that his economic condition has worsened since the original order was made. The evidence of the defendant's present assets and earning capacity was not as explicit as it might have been. The court below was not satisfied that the petitioner had proven a sufficient reduction in assets to warrant a reduction in the order.
It is apparent that the defendant has suffered a substantial loss in business ventures since the original order was entered. We have carefully examined the record now before us in the light of our conclusion on the record when the original order was entered. We are satisfied that the defendant's economic condition has deteriorated. We think the order is now too high and should be reduced to $450 per month.
Order reduced to $450 ...