Appeal, No. 253, Jan. T., 1962, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, No. 61-2817, in case of Margaret Thomas v. Jared Evans Thomas. Judgment vacated.
William L. Huganir, for appellant.
Philip R. Detwiler, with him High, Swartz, Roberts & Seidel, for appellee.
Before Bell, C.j., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen and O'brien, JJ.
OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE O'BRIEN
The case at bar originated as an action under The Landlord and Tenant Act of 1951, P.L. 69, as amended by the Act of July 25, 1953, P.L. 578, 68 P.S. § 250.101 et seq. Appellee filed a complaint before a justice of
the peace, alleging that appellant was her tenant under an oral lease "for an indeterminate term and at will, so long as the [appellant] ... made the mortgage payments", and that a forfeiture of said lease had resulted from appellant's failure to make mortgage payments. The justice of the peace entered judgment for possession of the land in favor of appellee and appellant appealed to the court below, where the matter was tried before a judge and jury. A verdict was returned in favor of appellee and appellant's motion for a new trial was denied by the court en banc and judgment entered on the verdict. It is from the judgment so entered that the instant appeal is prosecuted.
The appellant and appellee, husband and wife respectively, owned the premises in question as tenants by the entireties. On January 23, 1956, appellant conveyed his interest to appellee by deed, which deed was duly recorded. Subsequent to that conveyance, the alleged lease between the parties was formulated and, appellee contends, appellant occupied the premises as her tenant. Appellant claimed that he owned a life estate in the property by virtue of an oral agreement made with appellee at the time of the conveyance to her.
In order to resolve this controversy, appellant on August 1, 1960 brought an action in the court of common pleas to quiet title. Although this suit would have determined all issues between the parties, appellee brought the present landlord and tenant action before a justice of the peace to evict appellant. Appellee's case came to trial first.
Appellant raises only one issue in this appeal, namely, was the trial court in error when it refused to allow appellant's proffered evidence to the effect that he had a proprietary interest ...