Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COYLE v. POPE & TALBOT

July 3, 1962

Leon Albert COYLE
v.
POPE & TALBOT, INC. George MATTIS v. POPE & TALBOT, INC.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: GRIM

These are actions by longshoremen against a shipowner for personal injuries.

Service of process on defendant, a nonresident of this District, was made by serving the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania pursuant to the Pennsylvania Act of November 10, 1959, P.L. 1404, 12 P.S. (Pa) §§ 336, 337, authorizing such service on nonresident owners and operators of vessels in Pennsylvania waters and ports.

 Defendant moves to vacate and set aside the service on the ground that the Pennsylvania statute unconstitutionally overreaches state power in that it conflicts with that portion of Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution *fn1" which provides:

 'The judicial Power shall extend * * * to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction * * *.'

 It appears that this contention has been denied previously in Tardiff v. Bank Line, Ltd., 127 F.Supp. 945 (E.D.La.1954), and Franklin v. Tomlinson Fleet Corp., 158 F.Supp. 850 (N.D.Ill.1957), as well as by the order entered April 17, 1962, by Judge Luongo of this Court in Miles v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., Civil Action No. 30677. The decisions in these cases will be followed here.

 ORDER

 AND NOW, July 3, 1962, defendant's motion to vacate and set aside service of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.