Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MILLER UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE. (12/14/61)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


December 14, 1961

MILLER UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE.

Appeal, No. 269, April T., 1961, by claimant, from decision of Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-64308, in re claim of Willis E. Miller. Decision affirmed.

COUNSEL

Willis E. Miller, appellant, in propria persona, submitted a brief.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him David Stahl, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

Before Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (rhodes, P.j., absent).

Author: Watkins

[ 196 Pa. Super. Page 564]

OPINION BY WATKINS, J.

In this unemployment compensation case the Bureau of Employment Security issued a decision denying benefits under § 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS § 802(b)(1). A copy of this decision was mailed to the claimant, Willis E. Miller, on January 20, 1961, and was received by him on that day. The notice informed him that January 30, 1961, was the last day on which to file an appeal from this decision.

The claimant did not file an appeal on or before January 30, 1961, but waited until February 2, 1961, before filing. The referee dismissed the appeal on this ground and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed the decision.

The claimant contends that he was misled by the clerk in the local office as to the time limit for appeal, but admits that he failed to read the notice provided for him which clearly stated the last day for appeal. His testimony is conflicting and there is a denial that he was misled in any way, and there is competent testimony to support the finding that he was not misled

[ 196 Pa. Super. Page 565]

    or misinformed by any clerk representative regarding the filing of his appeal.

The issue raised by the claimant has been decided many times by this Court. Neither the Board nor this Court has the power to extend the time of appeal in the absence of a showing of fraud or its equivalent, which is certainly not present here. McKinney Unemployment Compensation Case, 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 470.

Disposition

Decision affirmed.

19611214

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.