Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

KUBACKI v. CITIZENS WATER COMPANY WASHINGTON (04/17/61)

April 17, 1961

KUBACKI
v.
CITIZENS WATER COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, APPELLANT.



Appeal, No. 47, March T., 1961, from judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, May T., 1958, No. 142, in case of Rose Kubacki, administratrix of estate of Andrew A. Kubacki, et al. v. The Citizens Water Company of Washington. Judgment reversed; reargument refused May 29, 1961.

COUNSEL

Francis H. Patrono, with him Patrono and Edwards, for appellant.

Adolph L. Zeman, with him Robert L. Zeman, and Zeman & Zeman, for appellee.

Before Jones, C.j., Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Bok and Eagen, JJ.

Author: Cohen

[ 403 Pa. Page 473]

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE COHEN.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County entered after denial of defendant's motions for judgment n.o.v. and new trial.

The jury had returned verdicts in favor of plaintiff, Rose Kubacki, Administratrix of the Estate of Andrew A. Kubacki, against defendant, The Citizens Water Company of Washington, Pennsylvania.

We have viewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff verdict winner, Geiger v. Schneyer, 398 Pa. 69, 157 A.2d 56 (1959), and are convinced that the court below should have granted defendant's motion for judgment n.o.v.

[ 403 Pa. Page 474]

On October 22, 1957, the decedent, Andrew A. Kubacki, in possession of a license authorizing him to fish in the defendant's Canonsburg Water Dam No. 2, was found dead on the crusted area of a mud flat at the eastern section of that site. A lengthy drought in the summer of 1957 had reduced the water in the eastern section of the reservoir by two-thirds and the muddy lake bottom, exposed to the sun and wind, became dry and baked to a crust with soft mud underneath. Cracks appeared on the crust, however, and revealed the blue semi-liquid below. Decedent, wearing his fishing boots but leaving his fishing equipment in his automobile, entered the lake bed near the road where he had left his car with the motor running. His foot tracks showed that he walked about 125 to 150 feet east, along the water's edge, and then turned north and walked fifteen to twenty-five feet away from the water's edge. At this point he broke through the crust and could not extricate himself. No one saw him getting into this difficulty and when his body was discovered he was on his back, one leg on top of the crust, having been pulled out of his fishing boot and the other leg remaining in its boot which was stuck in the mud. While there was a conflict as to the cause of death there was sufficient evidence to substantiate the plaintiff's theory that death was caused by a cerebral hemorrhage precipitated by the fright and emotional distress arising from being bemired. The gravamen of plaintiff's complaint is that defendant breached its duty to the decedent, a business visitor*fn1, by its failure to warn him of the peril incident to walking on the encrusted quagmire. We do not feel, under these

[ 403 Pa. Page 475]

    particular circumstances, that defendant owed such ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.