Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harshman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS THIRD CIRCUIT.


decided: May 17, 1960.

MARGUERITE HARSHMAN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RAY E. HARSHMAN, DECEASED, APPELLANT
v.
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

Ray E. Harshman, in his lifetime, suffered an accident while in the employ of the defendant railroad company. He has since died from causes unconnected with the accident and this action has been continued by his administratrix. The merits of the plaintiff's case were thoroughly discussed at a pre-trial hearing. At its conclusion and upon receipt of a supplementary memorandum from the plaintiff, the trial judge caused judgment to be entered in favor of the defendant. The basis of the court's action was that, assuming the plaintiff could prove all the facts which she alleged she was prepared to prove and assuming further that the plaintiff's position on the admissibility of certain statements was decided in favor of the plaintiff, still no claim on which recovery could be had was shown. We think the trial judge was right in his conclusion. We do not, therefore need to go into the always difficult question of when hearsay statements may be received as part of the res gestae.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.#

19600517

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.