Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WORSTER MOTOR LINES v. ROSS (06/30/59)

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


June 30, 1959

WORSTER MOTOR LINES, INC.
v.
ROSS, APPELLANT.

Appeal, No. 39, March T., 1959, from decree of Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, May T., 1957, No. 9, in equity, in case of Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Benjamin G. Ross et al. Decree affirmed; reargument refused July 24, 1959. Equity. Before EVANS, P.J. Adjudication filed directing conveyance of rights, assets and equipment and payment of purchase price; defendant's, Ross', exceptions to adjudication dismissed and decree entered. Defendant, Ross, appealed.

COUNSEL

James P. Bryan, with him Clarence T. Bryan, Paul B. Joslin, and Bryan, Joslin and Bryan, for appellant.

William W. Knox, with him Knox, Webber, Pearson & McLaughlin, for appellee.

Stephen E. Jones, with him Jones, Benson & Dwyer, for appellee.

Before Jones, C.j., Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Bok and Mcbride, JJ.

[ 396 Pa. Page 490]

OPINION PER CURIAM

The findings of the chancellor are supported by substantial evidence. Having been confirmed by the court en banc, on exceptions thereto, they have the binding effect of a jury's verdict and will not be disturbed on

[ 396 Pa. Page 491]

    appeal: Maxwell v. Schaefer, 381 Pa. 13, 19, 112 A.2d 69. From the findings, so established, the chancellor correctly drew the legal conclusions which, in turn, have resulted in the final decree entered by the court en banc.

Disposition

The decree is affirmed at the appellant's costs.

19590630

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.