Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

POLIS v. FRATKIN. (03/18/59)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 18, 1959

POLIS, APPELLANT,
v.
FRATKIN.

Appeal, No. 304, Oct. T., 1958, from order of Municipal Court of Philadelphia, Dec. T., 1957, No. 2273, in case of Philip S. Polis v. Ralph M. Fratkin et al. Order affirmed.

COUNSEL

Charles Polis, for appellant, in propria persona.

Melvin Lashner, with him Miller, Adelman & Lavine, for appellees.

Before Rhodes, P.j., Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ.

Author: Woodside

[ 188 Pa. Super. Page 587]

OPINION BY WOODSIDE, J.

This is a replevin action which, with another replevin action brought by the defendant in this action against the plaintiff, grew out of services rendered by a firm of accountants to a firm of lawyers. Each firm is seeking the return of papers allegedly belonging to the other firm, and each asks a money verdict against the other. These matters should be disposed of at a pretrial conference where professional men of the type here involved would be able to discuss their differences intelligently, and, under the supervision of the judge, arrive at a just solution of the controversy without resorting to prolonged litigation hardly merited by the circumstances of this case.

The matter now before us, which could only partially dispose of the controversy, was properly decided by the court below.

Disposition

The order is affirmed on the opinion of Judge BOYLE for the court below, which is published in 16 Pa. D. & C.2d 298.

19590318

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.