Appeals, Nos. 133 to 138, inclusive, Oct. T., 1958, from order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Application Docket Nos. A.69567, A.80905, and A.82024, Folders 1 and 2, in case of Harold W. Snyder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al. Order affirmed.
Harry P. Creveling, for appellants.
Edward Munce, Assistant Counsel, with him Jack F. Aschinger, Assistant Counsel, and Thomas M. Kerrigan, Counsel, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, appellee.
William J. Wilcox, with him Snyder, Wert, Wilcox, Frederick & Doll, for intervening appellee.
Before Rhodes, P.j., Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ.
[ 187 Pa. Super. Page 149]
We are here concerned with appeals of Harold W. Snyder and Lehigh Motor Freight, Inc. from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission dated December 9, 1957, in which appeals Agnes M. Smith was granted leave to intervene. On March 18, 1958, after hearing argument thereon, we refused the Commission's motions to quash the appeals. It will be necessary to set forth the history of the proceeding in some detail.
On August 18, 1947, at docket A.69567, the Commission granted a number of transportation privileges to Agnes M. Smith, who is engaged, as successor to her deceased husband, in the business of moving and general hauling. Included therein was a Class B privilege, hereinafter referred to as Bethlehem B, between points in the City of Bethlehem and within three miles of the limits thereof. On December 8, 1953, Mrs. Smith contracted in writing to transfer certain transportation privileges to Harold W. Snyder. On September 20, 1954, at docket A.80905 the Commission approved the transfer, which included Bethlehem B, and limited accordingly the remaining privileges of Mrs. Smith at
[ 187 Pa. Super. Page 150]
docket A.69567. On February 25, 1955, Mrs. Smith and Snyder agreed in writing that Bethlehem B had been erroneously included in the transfer, and should be transferred back from Snyder to Mrs. Smith. On March 3, 1955, at docket A.69567, Mrs. Smith filed an application, in which Snyder joined, requesting that the Commission approve such re-transfer. On March 18, 1955, at docket A.82024, Lehigh Motor Freight, Inc., of which Harold W. Snyder was one of the incorporators, applied to the Commission for approval of the transfer to it of the privileges originally transferred from Smith to Snyder at docket A.80905, including Bethlehem B. On May 31, 1955, on the petition of Snyder alone and without any notice to Mrs. Smith, the Commission granted Snyder leave to withdraw the application filed March 3, 1955, at docket A.69567. On June 4, 1955, Mrs. Smith filed a petition to intervene and protest the application of Lehigh Motor Freight, Inc. at docket A.82024, alleging that a mistake had been made in the original transfer proceeding at docket A.80905 and that Bethlehem B had been erroneously transferred to Snyder. On September 6, 1955, the Commission entered an order*fn1 directing a further hearing on Snyder's original application at docket A.80905, citing as its authority Section 1007 of the Public Utility Law.*fn2 Hearings
[ 187 Pa. Super. Page 151]
were held on October 6, 1955, and February 9, 1956, and the written agreement between Mrs. Smith and Snyder dated February 25, 1955, was introduced into the record. On September 4, 1956, the Commission entered an order amending its order dated September 20, 1954, at docket A.69567 so as to show that Mrs. Smith's remaining privileges included Bethlehem B, also amending its order of the same date at docket A.80905 so as to delete Bethlehem B from the privileges transferred to Snyder, and directing that its order be reflected in the record of the application of Lehigh Motor Freight, Inc. at docket A.82024. On September 28, 1956, Snyder and Lehigh Motor Freight, Inc. applied to the Commission for a re-hearing in dockets A.69567, A.80905, and A.82024, excepting to the order of September 4, 1956, inter alia, "for the reason that the Commission acted contrary to law in that it determined the contractual rights of private parties invoking equitable powers in a matter no way affecting the public interest". On November 26, 1956, the Commission "reopened the proceedings for further consideration". At a subsequent hearing on March 22, 1957, Snyder asserted for the first time that there was no error in the ...