Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HERBSTER UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE. (06/11/58)

June 11, 1958

HERBSTER UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE.


Appeal, No. 38, March T., 1958, by claimant, from decision of Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, dated April 11, 1957, No. B-44186, in re claim of Alton M. Herbster. Decision affirmed.

COUNSEL

Horace J. Culbertson, for appellant.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, for appellee.

Stanley H. Siegel, with him Harry L. Siegel, and Siegel and Siegel, for employer, intervening appellee.

Before Rhodes, P.j., Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ. (hirt and Gunther, JJ., absent).

Author: Rhodes

[ 186 Pa. Super. Page 173]

OPINION BY RHODES, P.J.

This is an appeal by claimant from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming the referee and denying compensation on the ground that claimant's unemployment was due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a compelling and necessitous nature within the meaning of section 402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS ยง 802 (b).*fn1

Claimant had worked for the American Viscose Corporation since 1929, and was a member of the Textile Workers Union of America, C.I.O., which had a labor-management agreement with the employer. His last day of employment was September 24, 1954. Where there were displacements resulting from technological changes, the agreement provided: "Notices shall be posted in the department affected by an impending displacement, inviting such employees, as may desire, to surrender their seniority rights and rights to recall, in exchange for displacement wages. Such employees shall inform the head of that department of their decision within seven (7) days after posting of impending displacement lists." Accordingly, the employer posted a notice on August 10, 1954, stating that displacement wages would be offered to employes in claimant's department. The notice set forth:

[ 186 Pa. Super. Page 174]

"All employees so displaced may be paid a displacement wage which shall be in an amount equivalent to one week's pay for each full year of the employee's past continuous service with the Company.

"Any employees desiring to surrender their seniority rights and rights to recall in exchange for displacement wages may do so and are requested to so advise the head of their department of such decision. For each senior employee displaced and so applying, the Company will retain a junior employee who would otherwise have been displaced by this technological change."

Claimant, on September 23, 1954, gave written notice to the employer of his election to accept payment of a displacement wage as a technologically displaced employe. The sum of $1,675 was paid to claimant by the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.