Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WALKIEWICZ WILL. (04/21/58)

April 21, 1958

WALKIEWICZ WILL.


Appeal, No. 37, March T., 1958, from decree of Orphans' Court of Allegheny County, No. 3382 of 1956, in re estate of Mary Ann Walkiewicz, deceased. Decree affirmed.

COUNSEL

Aaron Cohen, with him Marion E. Popiel, for appellant.

William J. Krzton, with him Esler W. Hays, for appellee.

Before Jones, C.j., Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno, Arnold, Jones and Cohen, JJ.

Author: Cohen

[ 392 Pa. Page 311]

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE COHEN

This appeal comes before us from a decree of the Orphans' Court of Allegheny County en banc dismissing the appeal of Alexander J. Walkiewicz from the probate of a will by the Register of Wills of Allegheny County.

On June 14, 1956, Mary Ann Walkiewicz, now deceased, executed a will leaving her entire estate to the son with whom she was residing subject to the payment of certain legacies to her other children. The testatrix could not write, and therefore, signed the will by mark, the making of which was witnessed by two subscribing witnesses. Neither of the subscribing witnesses, however, was able to testify that the name of the testatrix was subscribed to the will in her presence.

[ 392 Pa. Page 312]

The evidence on this question was supplied by the principal beneficiary who testified that he signed the name of the testatrix to the will in her presence immediately before she made her mark. The testimony of the non-subscribing witness was corroborated by his wife.

The appellant complains that the will was improperly executed because the proof that the name of the testatrix was signed to the will in her presence did not come from the two subscribing witnesses.

The wills Act of 1947, Act of April 24, 1947, P.L. 89, 20 P.S. ยง 180.1-.22, applies to the Walkiewicz will. We are unanimously of the opinion that there is no basis in the act for the requirement suggested by the appellant.

Section 2 of the act provides: "If the testator is unable to sign his name for any reason, a will to which he makes his mark and to which his name is subscribed in his presence before or after he makes his mark, shall be as valid as though he had signed his name thereto: Provided, He makes his mark in ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.