The opinion of the court was delivered by: FOLLMER
In support of his motion for judgment of acquittal this defendant assigned a number of reasons which may briefly be summarized as constituting a denial of due process in connection with the FBI report and summary thereof resulting in a refusal of conscientious objector status.
In his original questionnaire defendant did not sign Series XIV certifying that he was a conscientious objector and made no request for a special classification. Accordingly, on July 14, 1949, he was classified I-A by his Local Board. He was married June 29, 1949, and on July 28, 1949, the Local Board changed his classification to III-A, which was the classification for married men and which deferred him from military service and training at that time. On October 4, 1951, he was reclassified by his Local Board to Class I-A, of which action he was notified the following day. On October 10, 1951, defendant wrote to the Local Board advising that he had become an ordained minister; that his interest in Jehovah's Witnesses began in 1947 (later changed to 1948) when he met the girl who later became his wife, and that he was baptized in 1948 (later changed to 1949). In this latter he also outlined the course he had taken in studying the Bible and in preparing for the ministry, and also advised that in 1950 he was appointed Territory Servant by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society.
On October 22, 1951, defendant filed with the Local Board Special Form for Conscientious Objector (SSS Form No. 150) in which he signed Series I(B) showing that he was conscientiously opposed to participation in both combatant and noncombatant military service. He was given a hearing before the Local Board on October 25, 1951, after which he was again continued in Class I-A. Defendant was not immediately notified of this classification and on November 13, 1951, he filed with the Local Board a petition signed by sixty different persons showing that they recognized him as a minister.
Defendant executed and filed with the Local Board Special Form for Conscientious Objector (SSS Form No. 150) on February 6, 1952, and Classification Questionnaire (SSS Form No. 100) on February 11, 1952. In Series VI of the Questionnaire, which was left blank on the original Questionnaire, defendant set forth that he was an ordained minister of Jehovah's Witnesses, the date of his ordination being November 13, 1949. He also signed Series XIV indicating that he was a conscientious objector and requested Special Form therefor (SSS Form No. 150). He requested classification of a duly ordained minister of religion, Class IV-D. On the Special Form for Conscientious Objector defendant signed Series I(A), striking out, however, all of the printed statement except the portion reading, 'I am, by reason of my religious training and belief, conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form.' Defendant later wrote the Local Board explaining why he had deleted a portion of Series I(A).
On February 21, 1952, the Local Board again classified defendant in Class I-A. Defendant was notified of this action on February 27, 1952, and on March 7, 1952, he filed Notice of Appeal with the Local Board. The file was forwarded by the Local Board to the Appeal Board on March 17, 1952, from whence it was forwarded to the Department of Justice for investigation.
The FBI investigated and forwarded its report to the Department of Justice by whom the report and complete file was forwarded to the Hearing Officer.
The Hearing Officer mailed to defendant notice to appear before him on December 26, 1952. This notice had attached to it a set of instructions which failed to inform defendant that he had the right to receive a fair summary of any unfavorable evidence appearing against him in the FBI report. At the trial the Hearing Officer testified that his recollection was that there was no discussion about the FBI report at the hearing.
Following the hearing the Hearing Officer forwarded his report and recommendation concerning defendant's classification to the Department of Justice.
On March 31, 1953, the Special Assistant to the Attorney General wrote to the Appeal Board recommending that defendant be denied his conscientious objector classification. This letter reviewed the content of the several questionnaires and claim for conscientious objector status and then stated, inter alia:
'* * * The file reveals that registrant was not a conscientious objector when he filed his first SSS Form No. 100 in September, 1948. He did not maintain this view until October, 1951, when he was deprived of a III-A classification.
'Registrant appeared with several witnesses for his interview. He told the Hearing Officer that he devoted his evening hours and weekends to the church. He stated that as a 'minister' he is opposed to war and should have a IV-D classification. The Federal Bureau of Investigation report did not furnish any convincing evidence of sincerity or good faith. The Hearing Officer specially noted remarks on this point by members of registrant's own family. The witnesses attested to his 'ministerial' status. In view of all the evidence and as a result of his personal observation and interrogation, the Hearing Officer concluded that registrant was not conscientiously opposed to combatant and noncombatant duty by reason of religious training and belief. He, therefore, recommended a I-A classification.'
On June 4, 1953, defendant was advised of the action of the Appeal Board. Shortly thereafter defendant wrote to the Local Board requesting a reopening of his classification and an interview with the Board. His request was granted and he appeared before the Local Board on August 13, 1953, at which time the Board decided that the evidence presented did not warrant a reopening of the classification. He was in due course ordered to report for induction. He did report and after having been ...