Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA EX REL. GUSTAVE SPANOS v. LAWRENCE P. KEENAN (08/30/54)

August 30, 1954

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL. GUSTAVE SPANOS, APPELLANT,
v.
LAWRENCE P. KEENAN, SUPERINTENDENT, ALLEGHENY COUNTY WORKHOUSE



COUNSEL

Gustave Spanos, in pro. per.

Albert A. Fiok, Asst. Dist. Atty., James F. Malone, Jr., Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before Rhodes, P. J., and Hirt, Ross, Gunther, Wright, Woodside and Ervin, JJ.

[ 176 Pa. Super. Page 247]

PER CURIAM.

On November 5, 1946, relator was arrested and charged with assault and battery with intent to commit rape. After preliminary hearing, relator was released on bail. On June 6, 1947, at No. 202, December Sessions, 1946, Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County, relator was tried and found guilty of that offense. Sentence was deferred and relator was granted bail pending disposition of his motions and sentence.

While on bail relator was arrested and charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor and with public indecency. After preliminary hearing on these subsequent charges, relator was committed on August 1, 1947, to the Allegheny County Jail in default of bail for those charges. On October 31, 1947, he pleaded guilty to the charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and public indecency at Nos. 51 and 52, September Sessions, 1947. Sentence thereon was also deferred, and on that day relator was committed to the Pennsylvania Institution for Defective Delinquents at Huntingdon for treatment. See Act of May 25, 1937, P.L. 808, as amended, 61 P.S. ยง 541-1 et seq. It was provided that relator be returned to Allegheny County for sentence upon his release from the institution at Huntingdon. On July 6, 1948, upon petition of the Attorney General and upon the recommendation of the Board of Trustees of the Pennsylvania

[ 176 Pa. Super. Page 248]

Institution for Defective Delinquents to the effect that relator was not insane or a defective delinquent and should be released for recommitment to a suitable institution according to law, the court ordered that relator be released from said institution into the custody of the Sheriff of Allegheny County and be returned to the Allegheny County Jail to await further disposition by the court.

On September 13, 1948, the relator was brought before the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County on each of the three convictions and placed on probation for a period of five years in the custody of his sister who resided in Wheeling, West Virginia. One of the conditions of probation was that relator leave the State of Pennsylvania and not return during the period of probation. He was arrested in McKeesport, Pennsylvania, on other charges on December 17, 1948, and on December 21, 1948, probation was revoked and he was sentenced to a term of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years in the Allegheny County Workhouse at No. 202, December Sessions, 1946. On bill No. 51, September Sessions, 1947, relator was sentenced to a term of three years to begin and take effect upon the expiration of the sentence imposed at No. 202, December Sessions, 1946. The sentence on bill No. 52, September Sessions, 1947, was suspended.

Relator filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on September 16, 1953, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County; a rule to show cause was issued and a hearing, at which relator was present and represented by counsel, was held October 5, 1953. This appeal is from the final order of the court below directing a modification as to the effective date of the sentence imposed at No. 202, December Sessions, 1946,

[ 176 Pa. Super. Page 249]

    discharging the rule and refusing the writ. See Com. ex rel. Spanos v. Keenan, 102 P.L.J. 159.

At the hearing relator's counsel and the District Attorney of Allegheny County agreed and the court decided that there was no merit, with one exception, in relator's contentions. With this we agree and we see no reason to discuss the other contentions. We do, however, find ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.