Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

National Labor Relations Board v. L. B. Hosiery Co.

June 25, 1954

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER
v.
L. B. HOSIERY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AND LEE MAISEL, DOING BUSINESS AS MYERSTOWN HOSIERY MILLS, RESPONDENTS



Author: Mclaughlin

Before MCLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Adjudication and Decree

MCLAUGHLIN, C.J.: The National Labor Relations Board having petitioned this Court to adjudge respondents herein, their officers and agents, in civil contempt of this Court for having failed and refused, and continuing to fail and refuse, to obey the decrees entered herein on April 18, 1951, and January 16, 1954, and for other civil relief; and this Court having on June 7, 1954, issued its Order to Show Cause directing respondents, their officers and agents, to answer the allegations of said petition and to appear before this Court on June 21, 1954, and show cause, if any there be, why they should not be adjudged in civil contempt as prayed for in said petition; and the parties having thereafter appeared before this Court on June 21, 1954; and respondents being represented in court by counsel and by Jack Lustman, their agent; and counsel for respondents having conceded and stipulated, in the presence of said Jack Lustman, that Myerstown Hoisery Mills, Inc. is a successor to respondents within the meaning of the said decrees; and full opportunity having been afforded the parties to present evidence and argument; and the Court having heard oral argument; and it appearing to this Court from the pleadings and proceedings and argument of counsel that respondents hereinabove named and said Myerstown Hosiery Mills, Inc., their officers and agents, have failed and refused to comply with said decrees in that they have failed and refused to make whole the following named employees for loss of pay suffered by them by reason of the discrimination against them, as heretofore found and directed by the Court, by paying to them the sum set forth opposite their respective names, as follows:

Howard Kiscaddin $2,457.79

Lillian Gassert 304.00

Carrie Gassert 84.60

Grace Breidigen 304.00

Edith Schaeffer 24.48

Hilda Miller 238.64

Pauline Haffer 254.15

James R. Ludwig $4,174.87

Edwin L. Williamson 2.692.57

Russell R. Lutz 1,828.82

Francis Matz ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.