Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH EX REL. TOKARCHIK v. CLAUDY (01/19/54)

January 19, 1954

COMMONWEALTH EX REL. TOKARCHIK
v.
CLAUDY



COUNSEL

George A. Tokarchik, in pro. per.

Fred J. Fees, District Attorney, Ebensburg, for appellee.

Before Rhodes, P. J., and Hirt, Reno, Ross, Gunther, Wright and Woodside, JJ.

Author: Hirt

[ 174 Pa. Super. Page 510]

HIRT, Judge.

On relator's conviction of rape he was sentenced on January 11, 1943 to a term of imprisonment, computed from December 9, 1942, of from six to twelve years in the Western State Penitentiary. He was released on Parole on December 22, 1949 but was returned to custody in June of the following year as a parole violator. At the request of the President Judge of Cambria County, and with the approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare, relator then was transferred to the Cambria County Prison to serve the remainder of the original sentence, which will expire on December 9, 1954.

On December 5, 1950 relator was assigned to the performance of duties on a work detail outside the

[ 174 Pa. Super. Page 511]

    county prison. During the period of his freedom from custody he attacked one Jessie Nowak. He was charged in two separate indictments at Nos. 56 and 57 March Sessions 1951 in Cambria County with aggravated assault and battery, and assault with intent to ravish. Contrary to his present contention he was well represented by Frank P. Barnhart, an eminent member of the Cambria County Bar. Relator chose him as his counsel and retained him fully two weeks before the trial. The record indicates that counsel ably and diligently represented relator during the trial, and at the time of sentence after his conviction of both charges by the jury. A motion for a new trial on relator's conviction on Bill 57 was discharged after full argument before the court en banc. Relator thereupon was sentenced for assault with intent to ravish, for a term of two and one-half to five years in the Western State Penitentiary, to be computed from the expiration of the term of his imprisonment under the sentence of January 11, 1943. Relator was also sentenced on the conviction of aggravated assault and battery to a term of from one and one-half to three years, to be served concurrently with the sentence for assault with intent to ravish.

In the present proceeding relator petitioned for his discharge on habeas corpus and a rule was granted on his petition. On November 10, 1952, the date finally fixed for hearing, the rule was discharged and the petition dismissed without affording the relator the opportunity to support the averments of his petition by testimony. Although relator thus was denied a hearing we are unable to find merit in his appeal on that ground.

Relator's petition averred that at the consolidated trial on the two assault charges, Jessie Novak 'was coerced by the police officers to mistakenly identify

[ 174 Pa. Super. Page 512]

    him as her assailant.' This contention cannot be considered. If there were trial errors relator's remedy was by appeal, and no appeal was taken. Habeas corpus cannot be invoked to review matters passed on by the trier of facts at the trial. Com. ex rel. Lepera v. Burke, 173 Pa. Super. 627, 98 A.2d 408. The two bills were properly consolidated for trial. They charge separate offenses committed on the same occasion. But even if there were merit in relator's complaint as to the consolidation of the charges for trial, the objection could not be raised on habeas corpus. Com. ex rel. Haines v. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.