Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. MOON (12/29/53)

December 29, 1953

COMMONWEALTH
v.
MOON



COUNSEL

C. Henry Nicholson, Warren, for appellant.

M. A. Kornreich, Dist. Atty., H. S. Hampson, Warren, for appellee.

Before Rhodes, P. J., and Hirt, Reno, Ross, Gunther, Wright and Woodside, JJ.

Author: Wright

[ 174 Pa. Super. Page 336]

WRIGHT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Warren County discharging appellant's rule to show cause why a charge of nonsupport should not be dismissed and the order of support vacated.

On July 24, 1952, Janet Moon made complaint before an alderman in Fayette County alleging that 'the Defendant aforesaid, to wit, Norman Moon, did then and there unlawfully make an assault upon Janet Moon (Mrs. Norman Moon) by beating her with his fists and knocking her to the floor and calling her profane and vulgar names. Several times between the hours of 6 p. m. and 10 p. m. the defendant, to wit, Norman Moon, did then and there state that he would take the life of Janet Moon, his wife, unless she left their trailer home located at Morrell, in Dunbar Township; and Janet Moon states that, from the action and appearance of the defendant, she is afraid he will take her life and that she is actually afraid of the defendant, Norman Moon. * * * Complainant therefore prays and desires that a warrant may issue, and the defendant may be arrested and held to answer this charge of Assault & Battery. Surety of the Peace. Desertion & Non Support and further deponent sayeth not'. It should be noted that the allegations in the information do not include desertion and nonsupport, although such a charge is contained in the concluding prayer.

The transcript shows that a hearing was held at which the wife testified as to the assault and battery; and further, that 'defendant refused her support and she is dependent upon her mother for support and upon her neighbors for shelter'. Appellant entered into a recognizance to appear before the Court of Quarter Sessions of Fayette County to answer a charge of assault and battery, surety of the peace, and

[ 174 Pa. Super. Page 337]

Desertion and nonsupport. The wife also entered into a bond to appear and testify to the same charges on behalf of the Commonwealth. On the back of the transcript the charges were similarly listed as assault and battery, surety of the peace, and desertion and nonsupport. The docket of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Fayette County shows the case entered at No. 118 September Term 1952, and lists the charges as 'Assault & Battery, Surety of the Peace -- Desertion & N. S.' Nothing further was done in Fayette County.

The wife thereafter moved to Warren County and, on September 8, 1952, filed a complaint in that county charging appellant with desertion and nonsupport. Several hearings were held and, on December 29, 1952, the Court of Quarter Sessions of Warren County ordered appellant to pay the sum of $30 per week for the support and maintenance of his wife. He has never paid anything under this order and, at the time of the hearing on the rule, was in arrears some $1,080. On July 31, 1953, appellant presented his petition to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Warren County praying for the dismissal of the complaint against him on the ground that a prior prosecution in Fayette County on the same charge was still pending, so that the Court of Quarter Sessions of Warren County was without jurisdiction to enter the support order against him.

Under section 733 of the Act of 1939, P.L. 872, 18 P.S. ยง 4733, the only jurisdictional requirement is the physical presence of the husband or father within the limits of the Commonwealth. Commonwealth ex rel. Bucciarelli v. Bucciarelli, 162 Pa. Super. 582, 60 A.2d 554. Appellant relies, however, on the proposition that where two tribunals have concurrent jurisdiction over any ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.