Martin Silvert, Philadelphia, for appellant.
John J. Dautrich, Thomas Raeburn White, Jr., White, Williams & Scott, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Before Rhodes, P. J., and Hirt, Reno, Ross, Gunther and Wright, JJ.
[ 175 Pa. Super. Page 29]
The automobile accident from which this action arose occurred at the right angle intersection of Stention
[ 175 Pa. Super. Page 30]
and Willow Grove Avenues in Philadelphia. Plaintiff obtained a verdict, but judgment n. o. v. was entered for defendant, the court below concluding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.
Stenton Avenue runs north and south and is 36 feet wide, while Willow Grove Avenue runs east and west. Both streets have two direction traffic. At the time of the accident it was snowing slightly and the streets were wet. There were continuously blinking traffic lights at the intersection at the time, red for Willow Grove Avenue and yellow for Stenton Avenue.
On this appeal by plaintiff we are required by the jury's verdict to view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and to give him the benefit of every reasonable inference. Plaintiff was proceeding west on Willow Grove Avenue. He stopped his car before entering the intersection, looked both ways and saw nothing to his left and nothing to his right for a distance of some 200 feet, the maximum he could see because of obstructing trees. He proceeded to the middle of Stenton Avenue at which time he again looked to his right and observed defendant approaching at a speed estimated at 45-50 miles an hour and at a distance of 75 to 100 feet away. Plaintiff continued across the intersection until, when about three-quarters of the way across, he was struck on the right side of his car by defendant.
Plaintiff testified that when he observed defendant the latter appeared to start to slow down, but then increased his speed again. There is also some question as to exactly where the front of plaintiff's car was located when he looked to his right and saw defendant. He was either about two feet beyond the middle of Stenton Avenue or just at the middle line. It is unnecessary to locate the exact spot, however, for plaintiff admitted that he could not have stopped his
[ 175 Pa. Super. Page 31]
car without entering the southbound lane ...