Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WEXLER v. BONWIT (01/05/53)

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 5, 1953

WEXLER, APPELLANT,
v.
BONWIT, TELLER & COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA

Appeal, No. 249, Jan. T., 1952, from order of Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County, Dec. T., 1950, No. 6368, in case of Ruth J. Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Company of Philadelphia. Order affirmed.

COUNSEL

George J. Ivins, for appellant.

Samuel D. Goodis, with him Thomas F. Devine and Sundheim, Folz, Kamsler & Goodis, for appellee.

Before Stern, C.j., Stearne, Jones and Chidsey, JJ.

[ 372 Pa. Page 251]

OPINION PER CURIAM

The appeal is by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial, the assigned reason being that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. President Judge BROWN in his opinion reviewed the evidence at length. We are unable to discover any palpable abuse of discretion and therefore decline to disturb such exercise of discretion: Bellettiere v. Philadelphia, 367 Pa. 638, 81 A.2d 857; Beal v. Reading Company, 370 Pa. 45, 87 A.2d 214.

Order affirmed.

Disposition

Order affirmed.

19530105

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.