Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

FRANTZ v. HAYS COAL CO. (07/19/51)

July 19, 1951

FRANTZ
v.
HAYS COAL CO.



COUNSEL

William A. Meyer, Edward T. Tait, Kountz, Fry & Meyer, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Samuel J. Feigus, Uniontown, for appellee.

Before Rhodes, P. J., and Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross, Arnold and Gunther, JJ.

Author: Ross

[ 169 Pa. Super. Page 249]

ROSS, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant in an assumpsit action from the entry of judgment for the plaintiff on the pleadings.

Summary judgment will be entered only in a clear case and any doubt should be resolved against the entry of such judgment. National Cash Register Co. v. Ansell, 125 Pa. Super. 309, 189 A. 738; Roth v. Golden Slipper Restaurant & C. Inc., 167 Pa. Super. 558, 76 A.2d 475. In our opinion, this is such clear case, and the judgment of the learned court below will be affirmed.

The case involves the interpretation of a written contract under the terms of which the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, the owner, under lease, of certain coal land situate in Georges Township, Fayette County, to strip, remove and deliver to defendant's

[ 169 Pa. Super. Page 250]

    tipple the coal of defendant, for which the defendant was to pay the plaintiff $3 per ton. The plaintiff agreed to indemnify and save harmless the defendant against any claim or claims or loss or obligation of whatsoever manner from any operation of the contractor, and also agreed to carry workmen's compensation on his employes, to comply with all state or federal laws relating and providing for all taxes, including old age, employment and other forms of social security and to keep sufficient funds available for payment of all insurance premiums and said taxes. He further agreed to comply with all obligations, liabilities and requirements imposed on either the contractor or the defendant company by the Pennsylvania Bituminous Coal Open Pit Mining Conservation Act, and to the withholding by the defendant company of ten cents per ton as a guarantee for the covenants herein made, which withheld amount was not to be paid to plaintiff until a complete release and discharge of all liability imposed under the Bituminous Coal Open Pit Mining Conservation Act had been received by the defendant. On October 27, 1948, the plaintiff was notified by the defendant company that it had paid $1,424.08 out of the fund withheld to the United Mine Workers Welfare and Retirement Fund. This suit was brought by the contractor (plaintiff) to recover from the producer (defendant) this amount withheld by the defendant from monies due the contractor and paid into the Welfare and Pension Fund.

The contract involved in this case differs in no material respect from the contract we construed in Davis v. Wilson, 166 Pa. Super. 462, 72 A.2d 148. It, as in the Davis case, involves the liability -- as between the parties -- for the payment into the United Mine Workers Pension and Retirement Fund of a royalty on each ton of coal produced. The question,

[ 169 Pa. Super. Page 251]

    as in the Davis case, is: As between the producer of coal and the one who, as an independent contractor, mines and loads the coal, which is liable for the payment of this royalty where the contract prepared by the producer does not ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.