Henry Kauffman and Louis Little, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
Maurice H. Goldstein, Pittsburgh, for appellee.
Before Rhodes, P. J., and Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross and Arnold, JJ.
[ 167 Pa. Super. Page 253]
The failure of this marriage, which culminated in plaintiff's obtaining a divorce decree on the ground of indignities, can be traced to an inordinate desire on the part of defendant for a night life of gaiety, which she preferred to staying at home with her husband and their two small children. Although plaintiff admittedly was a good provider, except as to clothing for herself and the children, and was earning on an average upwards of $4,000 a year, defendant in the summer of 1946 went to work as a waitress in a licensed restaurant or cafe. Her hours were from 4, 5 or 6 p. m. to 1, 2 or 3 a. m. She engaged her sister to stay with the children, a five-year-old girl and a two-year-old boy, until their father got home from work, usually about 5:30 p. m.
The first he knew that his wife had gone to work was when he returned home one evening and found a note from her telling him what she had done. He waited up for her to come home that night, or early the following morning, and told her 'Stay home and raise the children * * * I am providing for this home.' But she continued to work and at the time of the trial had advanced to the position of hostess in another cafe. She not only neglected her household duties for the cafe life, which was more to her liking, but frequently returned home 'drunk and disorderly' anywhere from 3 to 5 o'clock in the morning.
[ 167 Pa. Super. Page 254]
Plaintiff's mother testified that on an occasion when she was visiting them when their first-born child was about two years old, defendant 'was terribly drunk * * * stripped herself of all her clothes * * * and * * * was standing nude and her little girl was looking at her.' Her husband took a Turkish towel and put it around her, but she threw the towel away and got as far as the bathroom where she fell down and had to be put to bed.
Plaintiff testified that one morning in the summer of 1947 defendant returned home from work intoxicated and when he went to open the door for her '* * * there she was, her blouse all open. No shoes. Hair all mussed up, and she staggered in and fell on the floor. I put her to bed.' He further testified that she came home intoxicated often -- on an average of two or three times a week -- that he asked her to quit working and 'even went down to see her boss. He said it was up to her.'
Finally on November 6, 1947, he received a telephone call between 2 and 3 o'clock in the morning to 'Watch and keep watching.' He dressed and did as he was told. About 3 o'clock his wife was brought home in an automobile and when plaintiff demanded to know who had brought her home, she cursed him and tried to kick him in the groin. He tussled with her and as a result he was arrested two days later on charges of assault and battery, surety of the peace, and nonsupport. When he returned home, after being released on bail, he found that the 'door lock had been changed.' He has not since lived with his wife but is supporting the children.
The following excerpt from defendant's testimony is strongly indicative of her attitude toward, and her feeling for, her husband and the children:
'Q. Who took care of the children when they were sick, at night? A. He was home at the time ...