UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
June 13, 1947
DIAS et al.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: BARD
Defendants' motion to dismiss must be granted for the following reasons:
1. Jurisdiction of this action is purportedly based upon diversity of citizenship. However, the complaint contains no allegation as to the citizenship of the following defendants: James L. Hill, Robert Walkinshaw, Kensington National Bank, Joseph P. Cattie and Brothers, Enterprise Galvanizing Company, General Smelting Company, Ajax Metal, Superior Zinc Company, American Nickeloid Company, White Brothers Smelting Company, and Pennsylvania Smelting Company.
2. The cause of action alleged presents a 'labor dispute' within the meaning of § 13 of the Act of March 23, 1932,
in that the dispute is 'between one or more employees or associations of employees and one or more employees or associations of employees', and the controversy concerns the 'representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing, or seeking to arrange terms or conditions of employment.'
Under the provisions of the Act of March 23, 1932, the complaint is defective because it does not allege facts from which the Court could make the findings which, under § 7 of the Act,
are a prerequisite to injunctive relief; furthermore, Sec. 4(c) of the Act
prohibits the granting of the relief requested in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, and 12 of the prayer of the complaint.